Ongoing Conspiracies

The thing about ongoing conspiracies is that the conspirators are prosecutable for years after the conspiracy actually ends. In this case it is continuing at this very moment, so these conspirators are far from off-the-hook no matter what they might believe. The Real Orlando News touched on some of the basics of the phone-line block conspiracy as it relates to Orlando; however, if you read Memoirs then you know that Orlando was far from the only city where this was and is transpiring. The main areas with the problem are Orlando, Anaheim, Los Angeles, and Las Vegas, but we can also include Charlotte, Houston, Dallas, Indianapolis, San Diego, Reno, San Antonio, and Washington D.C. – now most of these cities were added later in the conspiracy, but the first listed are the original four. I'm not sure if it all began in Orlando or Anaheim.

In Early Phone-line Blocks I described the basic process in the 1990s. While I was called nuts by several heads of security for Vista United Telephone that sits on Disney property and United Telephone (Sprint) in Orlando in 1993-1995, by 1997, there were others experiencing the same problems in Las Vegas. One victim in Las Vegas pursued it in state court in 1997, and then later in federal court. The last of the case was dismissed in 2006. Eddie Munoz blamed Sprint, primarily for having insecure telephone lines. Now Munoz was not an escort service owner; he owned an advertising business where escort agencies placed advertisements. I'll quote from case documents filed in the 2004 federal case:

Mr. Munoz asserts that Sprint has allowed calls to his business, primarily from Las Vegas strip hotels, to be diverted, blocked, or otherwise controlled or routed to competing outcall service businesses. Mr. Munoz alleges that some callers to his business get false busy signals, beeping sounds, or dead air; that calls are gone before they can be answered; that phones cut-off in the middle of conversations; that his business phones stop ringing for extended periods during hours that are normally his busiest business hours; and that during such periods not even wrong numbers are received.
There is a list of witnesses included in the complaint documents. I need to discuss this briefly here: Eddie Munoz blamed Sprint because the company was supposed to be selling secure telephone lines, and he didn't claim to know specifically who did what where to the telephone lines – he simply held Sprint accountable. In court Sprint argued several points, including that they shouldn't be held accountable anymore than any other telephone company, but they did reluctantly concede that there were indeed line-block troubles, but they were not clear as to what specifically was transpiring. Munoz also named Kevin Mitnick, hacker extraordinaire turned computer security consultant, as his consulting witness.

Kevin Mitnick testified that he couldn't find any case where they could recreate the situation where a call was diverted to a competitor, but that it was his opinion, "that further testing needs to be done." Mr. Mitnick further testified "that he does not know if Mr. Munoz's calls are being blocked or diverted." The court decided that there was evidence of other causes that may be responsible for Munoz's problems, including "diversion and/or blockage of telephone calls at private hotel PBX systems," and declared the possible causes as not the responsibility of Sprint.
Now I would tend to agree with the court in that if an expert like Kevin Mitnick couldn't pin it down – what could be expected of Sprint? I was only angry with Sprint here in Orlando because no one in the upper-level of security would acknowledge that what I stated was possible – they all acted like I was a kook. The Munoz case in Las Vegas wasn't presented until several years later, and that was the state case in 1997.

For those in the legal field, the cases referred to herein are:
EDDIE PAUL MUNOZ vs. CENTRAL TELEPHONE CO. NEVADA d/b/a SPRINT OF NEVADA, Case No. CV-S-04-1212-RCJ-RJJ, Filed in United States District Court, District of Nevada

Court of Appeals Docket # 05-15295, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

State of Nevada Case No. 97-15906
At any rate, I've worked on this since early 1993, in-between saving my life and the two-week jury trial, and five years of college, and finally today I have more answers. I have answers in relation to the PBX line blocks, as already discussed, and I also have answers concerning the new, or more recent, wireless blocking that is transpiring in the resort areas here in Orlando.

As far as I'm concerned I'm owed lots of money by the conspirators and some serious apologies from the Orlando MBI of past and the Office of the Statewide Prosecutor – well, I'll settle for the money from the conspirators at this point in life. I imagine that Eddie Munoz would feel the same. But I won't be going away – I can't because that's what happens when you spend so much time discrediting a person, attempting to bury them in a Florida prison, and leaving that person with nothing to lose. I'm not dumb enough to believe that the clowns from the MBI concocted that criminal case without instigation from our gang of conspirators involved herein – it might be a great time to tell them (the MBI) that they were unknowingly used.

Next: I'll continue painting the picture of the ongoing conspiracy