Anonymous stated:
Just my $.02 ,
Defamation" is the general term used internationally, and is used in this article where it is not necessary to distinguish between "slander" and "libel". Libel and slander both require publication.
The fundamental distinction between libel and slander lies solely in the form in which the defamatory matter is published. If the offending material is published in some fleeting form, as by spoken words or sounds, sign language, gestures and the like, then this is slander.
Libel is defined as defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures. The law of libel originated in the 17th century in England. With the growth of publication came the growth of libel and development of the tort of libel.
I looked up Dienecia Johnson record:
05/21/2005 NO DRIVER LICENSE
01/25/2006 COUNTY EVICTION
06/11/2006 DRIVING VEHICLE IN UNSAFE CONDITION
06/11/2006 FAILURE TO FURNISH PROOF OF INSURANCE
10/06/2006 TRAFF IN COCAINE 28 BUT LESS THAN 200 GRAMS
10/06/2006 POSS OF CANNABIS W INTENT TO SELL OR DELIVER
10/24/2006 DRIVERS LICENSE NOT CARRIED AND EXHIBITED
11/03/2006 DRIVERS LICENSE NOT CARRIED AND EXHIBITED
11/03/2006 OPER MOTOR VEHICLE WITH UNLAWFUL SOUND MAKING DEVI
05/15/2007 DRIVERS LICENSE NOT CARRIED AND EXHIBITED
07/04/2007 IMPROPER PASSING
07/04/2007 FAILURE TO FURNISH PROOF OF INSURANCE
09/21/2008 OBSCURED TAG
09/27/2009 316.2956.1 OPERATING WITH ILLEGAL SUNSCREENING 02/25/2010 DISMISSED 20098973GDW
09/27/2009 316.2956.1 OPERATING WITH ILLEGAL SUNSCREENING 02/25/2010 DISMISSED 20098972GDW
09/27/2009 316.2956.1 OPERATING WITH ILLEGAL SUNSCREENING 02/25/2010 DISMISSED 20098971GDW
09/27/2009 316.2956.1 OPERATING WITH ILLEGAL SUNSCREENING 02/25/2010 DISMISSED 20098970GDW
09/27/2009 316.2952.2 SIGN OR COVERING ON WINDSHIELD
09/27/2009 316.614.4.B SAFETY BELT VIOLATION OPERATOR
09/27/2009 316.610-C DRIVING VEHICLE IN UNSAFE CONDITION
05/19/2010 PATERNITY/DISESTABLISHMENT
07/30/2010 PATERNITY/DISESTABLISHMENT
10/30/2010 DRIVING W LIC SUSP REV CANC W O KNOWLEDGE
10/30/2010 FAILURE TO FURNISH PROOF OF INSURANCE
She was arrested for selling both cocaine and marijuana. That is fact, not fiction.
Also the FDLE has dropped all of the original charges yet added another. Florida Today paints a different picture.
Then why is there only one charge and not the original 8 or so? False information by the chief given to the FDLE. Also did you see who just retired early? The city manager.
Why would the arrest of Carter inspire so these two to retire?
I'll give you one clue, retirement benefits. They both could be subject to no retirement benefits.
What is Carter's sole charge standing? Giving someone a ticket for a poorly lit license plate. Florida read that a police offer must be able to read it from 50 feet.
Did you know that Florida Today was given the wrong video to post? I do
I responded:
So you want to continue the argument in reference to Carter? No problem.And here we are again, though this “anonymous” is not the same person as the last “anonymous” as is obvious by the post content; either that or he was drunk when he responded earlier. Once again the victim, Dienecia Johnson, is the one being attacked. Isn't it always that way when a bad cop is seeking some absurd defense for his actions?
Libel law in the UK is different from libel laws in the US. You left out one major point - truth is an absolute defense in a libel suit. If this were not the case I probably would have been sued for "Memoirs of an Accused Madam," but it is the case.
Look for my response post later this evening
First let's again address Dienecia Johnson's arrest record, specifically the statement that, “ She was arrested for selling both cocaine and marijuana. That is fact, not fiction.”
No shit Sherlock. As I stated in the blog post that you responded to, the case was DROPPED by PROSECUTORS. Furthermore, the case had to be incredible – she was released on her own recognizance. Even the judge knew it was bullshit. So Ms. Johnson experienced a false arrest – this is a point against Carter, and you're not doing a great job at defense buddy.
In so far as the rest of that list of crap charges goes, I am well aware of how bad cops work. When they have no real reason for a traffic stop, they simply create one. How in the hell could anyone know she didn't have her driver's license in her wallet before pulling her over? There was no other charge in several of the listed cases making it clear that she was being harassed.
In a few of the cases there was the usual bullshit charge: obscured tag; sign or covering on windshield; and driving vehicle in unsafe condition. Obscured tag my ass – someone needs to get some glasses if he cannot see a tag with one of the two tag lights out.
My son was pulled over for the same crap by a whacko overzealous Cocoa P.D. officer several years ago. The jerk then used this to write a ticket for “running a red light” and held my son for over 30 minutes while waiting on the dogs – they were busy in Melbourne. Needless to say my son took the red light ticket to court and was found “not guilty” because right on red at that particular intersection was absolutely normal. Hint – he took photos of the intersection to court. As if any of this would give him probable cause for a vehicle search! (lucky for whacko cop the dogs were busy in Melbourne)
Obviously you are a cop, and perhaps you're Frank Carter – I have no idea – but if you do not have anything better to do than harass motorists in your sector, then Melbourne P.D. needs to toss your ass as well.
I do not pretend to know anything about videos given to Florida Today. I do know that Frank Carter is an overzealous whack cop that harassed Black motorists in his sector for far too many years. People in that area were petrified of him. I'm not in that area or I would have seen his bad cop ass in court long before.
You have the audacity to bring-up a drug charge that was dropped by prosecutors a while back? Denecia Johnson should be filing suit for false arrest. All of that bullshit traffic crap is exactly that – do not pretend she ever harmed anyone, had an accident, or actually did anything whatsoever wrong. Your list merely shows the many times that the woman has been a Carter victim.
In so far as libel goes – truth is an absolute defense in a libel suit. If you (or Carter) believes differently, then file away. I am not your typical victim and I will see your bad ass in court.
No comments:
Post a Comment